101 (or thereabouts) of Margo's pet peeves in the writing of research papers

HOME

Research Publications Courses Software Schedule

References are not nouns. What does this mean? It means that the following is wrong: "In [1], Jack and Jill went up a hill." Instead, you can say, "Mother Goose reports that Jack and Jill went up a hill [1]."

Now that Halloween is over, go on a which hunt. In general, everywhere you are using "which," you should be using "that." The particular rule is that "which" prefaces a clause that could be removed from the sentence without changing the meaning; if you need the clause to understand the sentence, then you want "that." A corollary is that if the phrase is preceded by a comma, you probably want "which."
An example:

The car that is in the garage is broken.
The 1982 Toyota Corolla, which was decomissioned last year, was named Beauregard.

Note the example in the text above. Why is "that" correct instead of "which?"


Keep "only" close to its clause. If you use the word "only," push it as close as possible to the clause to which it applies.

If you have one subject and two predicates, do not separate the predicates with a comma.

Laundry lists of references are often worthless. Avoid things like, "Many people have investigated caching [1][2][3][4][5][6]." Instead, tell us something about what the references actually say. "While many people have studied caching, only one study shows that it is a fundamentally flawed idea [1]. Several others indicate that it is the best thing since sliced bread [2][3][4], and a few authors actually seem to provide an accurate evaluation [5][6]." (Hint: this means that you actually have to have read the related work.)

Avoid "very." I believe it was Mark Twain who said, "Substitute d--n every time you're inclined to write 'very'; your editor will delete it and the writing will be just as it should be."

Avoid passive voice. It is significantly easier and more enjoyable to read technical prose written in the active voice.

Your paper should not read as a murder mystery. Tell the author in the beginning, that's in the abstract, what the significant results of the research are. There is nothing more frustrating than reading a paper wondering the whole time what you're going to see.

Use fewer and less appropriately. Fewer implies that you are describing a discrete quantity while less implies a continuous one. So, you might have fewer people or things, but you might have less inclination or less clutter in your room.

Impact is probably the most over-used term in technical papers today. People use it as a verb, they use it as a noun. I use it to describe wisdom teeth (impacted). Just avoid it. Use affect(s) and effect(s).

Another phrase I despise is "seeks to." Disks seek to places, but research papers don't; research projects don't; and you shouldn't either.

Click here for tips on avoiding gender-specific writing
Click here for Strunk and White (which should probably be read annually)